|
1
|
- Richard Balamut
- SHIVA Technologies
- Syracuse, NY
- ILAP 2007 – July 27, 2007
- Breckenridge, CO
|
|
2
|
- The three major components of HR-GDMS instrumentation
- Ion source
- Mass analyzer
- Detector
- Review of sample data
- Generation of data
- Applications
- Summary of the technique’s strengths and limitations
|
|
3
|
- Three major components of HR-GDMS instrumentation
- Ion Source
- Mass Analyzer
- Detector
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Ion source
- Glow discharge
- The luminous effect of passing current through a gas with a large
potential difference (voltage) between electrodes
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Ion source
- Glow discharge
- The ability to generate stable analyte ion population directly from a
solid sample – eliminating the problems of dissolution, dilution, and
contamination from sample handling
- Separation of atomization and ionization (dark space), this is not the
case with Spark Source, Thermal Ionization, Laser Ion-desorption, and
Secondary Ion – Mass Spectrometry [SSMS, TIMS, LIMS, SIMS]
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Mass Analyzer
- Double focusing magnetic sector
- Uniform high mass resolution using a single set of tuning conditions
- High ion transmission - characteristic at > 75%
- Mass resolution (m/Dm) better than 4000m
- Extremely low background allows for ultra-trace detection
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Detector
- Dual detector system
- Faraday cup for major elements
- Daly detector for trace and ultra-trace element concentration
- Dynamic working range of eleven orders of magnitude
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- What does the technique measure?
- HR-GDMS measures the number of ions arriving at the detector(s) – ion
beam intensity
- The number of ions is proportional to the number of atoms in the sample
|
|
19
|
- Semi-quantitative - Ion Beam Ratio
- Assumes that the ratio of ion current for any single isotope, with
respect to the total ion current, is representative of the ratio of the
number of atoms of that isotope in the sample to the other constituent
atoms of the sample
- Ci = (Ii
/ Im) Cm
- This is a variation on internal standard calibration – the matrix
element serving as the internal standard
- Result within a factor of 2 or 3 are typical
|
|
20
|
- Quantitative - Relative Sensitivity Factors
- In a given matrix the proportionality factor varies from element to
element - this factor is measured by analyzing a standard
- Parameter RSF(i/m), which is the slope of the calibration line, is
commonly understood as the Relative Sensitivity Factor (RSF)
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Quantitative - Relative Sensitivity Factors
- The factors (RSF’s) are then applied to the ion beam ratio for
quantification
- Below is application of RSF to a single element matrix
- Ci = (RSFi / RSFm ) x (Ii
/ Im)
|
|
25
|
- Ideal uses for HR-GDMS
- Trace and ultra-trace element determination in high purity metals,
alloys, carbides, ceramics, semiconductors, and electronic materials
- Depth profiling of flat surfaces for major, minor, and trace elements
- Identification of unknowns from minute amount of specimen
- Full element characterization of powder and particulate materials
|
|
26
|
- Relative Industries served
- Sputter target manufacturing
- Aerospace
- Refractory metals and alloys
- Rare earth metals and oxides
- Precious metals
- High purity materials production
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Published GDMS Method (ASTM
F01.17)
- ASTM F1593 – 97 Aluminum
- ASTM F1710 – 97 Titanium
- ASTM F1845 – 97 Aluminum-Copper, Aluminum-Silicon, and
Aluminum-Copper-Silicon Alloys
- ASTM F2405 – 04 Copper
- ASTM Fxxxx- xx In progress for Ta
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- HR-GDMS Limitations
- Sample heterogeneity
- Volatile samples
- Not suited for organic materials
- Time allotment per sample analysis
|
|
35
|
- HR-GDMS Strengths
- Full periodic table coverage (except H)
- Sub-ppb to ppt detection
- Minimal matrix effects
- Linear and simple calibration
- Depth profiling of layers and coatings (at ~0.1 microns/minute)
|
|
36
|
- ILAP 2007 – July 27, 2007
- Breckenridge, CO
|